Alexander Prokhanov: biography, personal life, photos, books and journalism. Sergei Prokhanov, biography, news, photos Alexander Prokhanov biography children

The childhood of Sergei Prokhanov

The first glaring disappointment occurred when Seryozha did not become a laureate at the “Musical Spring” competition. For him it was a great psychological trauma. Around that time, his voice began to break.

Kolobok - Mustachioed nanny - Sergei Prokhanov

Prokhanov’s family, as he himself put it, is proletarian. The father was a worker. The future actor inherited his temperament and irrepressibility from his father, who was always the life of the party. From his mother he inherited a dislike for showing off. Prokhanov graduated from a physics and mathematics school; he liked the exact sciences.

At the same time, he studied in a theater studio. The young man chose the Shchukin School for himself and became its student. Sergei took Vera Lvova’s course. Many people called Prokhanov radiant at that time. It was a wonderful time. The students of this course were called nothing less than “celebration artists”; they hosted television programs on TV and could lift people’s spirits.

The beginning of the filmography of Sergei Prokhanov

It turns out that after graduating from theater school in 1974, Sergei was already actively acting. His first theater was the Mossovet Theater, where he was invited as a college graduate. There he successfully debuted on the same stage with honored masters, but being successful in cinema, Sergei played only minor roles there for a number of years.

The real turning point occurred when the audience saw the actor in the title role in the production of “Sasha.” From that moment on, he was considered a serious actor in the theater. It would seem that everything was going well, but at that time such eminent directors as Viktyuk, Chernyakhovsky and Ginkas left the theater.

The best films of Sergei Prokhanov

"Chauntecleer" at the Luna Theater. Interview with Prokhanov

At that time, he played in the films “Leapfrog”, “First Cavalry”, “Sashka”, “Wingspan”, “Feat of Odessa”, “White Crows”, etc.

Prokhanov received a prominent role in the film, which viewers saw in 1991. Its name is “Genius”. Alexander Abdulov starred in the title role. Sergei played a speculator named Kostya.

The actor decided to finally part with cinema after filming in the detective story “Wanderers' Rest” was completed, where he again had a small role.

The actor believed that cinema was dead and he had nothing to do in it. He completely switched to working in the theater. However, on the screen, TV viewers also saw Prokhanov as a TV presenter. He hosted a program about the movie “Know Ours.” Sergei thought that over time it would turn into an almanac, he planned to create several interesting sections, but in reality the TV show began to resemble a quiz show about certain films. Despite the fact that he liked working as a TV presenter, he left television.

Sergei Prokhanov at the Theater of the Moon

When, as a director, Prokhanov began staging “Byzantium” on the stage of his native theater, it turned out that he had to wait in line to get into the repertoire. We could have waited a year or two. From that moment it became clear that we needed our own theater. This would immediately give Sergei the opportunity to act independently.

Sergey Prokhanov currently

So Sergei became a director. He reworks all the theater productions himself. Prokhanov believes that from that moment he became completely different, they were no longer responsible for him, but he was responsible for his troupe.

Over its more than twenty-year history, many famous actors have played in the “Theater of the Moon”. All productions are emotional and sensual, and not without eroticism. Prokhanov does not tolerate anything simple, he believes that in the theater the audience should feel a dream, should see another world. In the “Theater of the Moon” there are no productions about poverty, about some “Vaskas” and “Petkas”. The very name of the performances speaks of their airiness and cosmic quality: “Lyromania”, “Little Moon”, “Tender is the Night”, “Thais the Shining”.

Sergey Prokhanov in the Alarm Clock program

There is a film studio at the Prokhanov Theater. Its name is “Moon-film”. Prokhanov starred in the leading role in the first film. In the story, the director says goodbye to his theater and hands it over to another director.

Personal life of Sergei Prokhanov

When the recently married Tatiana and Sergei received their first two-room apartment, Sergei removed almost all the interior partitions during the renovation. The family was even threatened with eviction for this. So the newlyweds lived in a spacious apartment until the children appeared and they needed a nursery. We had to build the walls again. This time, Sergei Borisovich remodeled it so that he even had a small office.

The couple lived together for twenty-five years. There were different times in their lives; the acting profession could not help but affect family life. His wife raised their two children. The eldest daughter became a costume designer. She works in her father's theater.

Now Prokhanov is divorced. He lives alone.

Alexander Prokhanov is a famous Russian writer and politician. Known as the editor-in-chief of the newspaper “Zavtra”, in 1982 he was awarded the Lenin Komsomol Prize. Already in 2002, he received the National Bestseller Award for the novel “Mr. Hexogene,” which tells about a conspiracy by the special services to change power in Russia.

Childhood and youth

Alexander Prokhanov was born in 1938. He was born in Tbilisi. His ancestors were Molokans. They were forced to move from the Saratov and Tambov provinces to Transcaucasia. The grandfather of the hero of our article was a prominent Molokan theologian, the brother of Stepan Prokhanov, who founded the All-Russian Union of Evangelical Christians.

Alexander Prokhanov received his higher education in Moscow. In 1960, he graduated from the Aviation Institute and worked as an engineer at a research institute. I became interested in literature in my last year at university and actively began writing poetry and prose.

Labor activity

At the same time, at first Alexander Prokhanov did not think about becoming a professional writer. Therefore, he worked as a forester in Karelia, as a tour guide in the Khibiny Mountains, and participated in a geological party in Tuva. During these years of wandering throughout the Soviet Union, he became especially interested in Vladimir Nabokov and Andrei Platonov.

In 1968, he got a job at Literaturnaya Gazeta, deciding to devote more time to his own writing opportunities. Mostly he is sent on business trips abroad. Alexander Prokhanov, whose photo is in this article, writes reports from Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Angola, and Cambodia. People began to talk about him after he was one of the first to describe the armed border conflict between Russia and China on Damansky Island in 1969.

Member of the Writers' Union

Very soon, they decided to officially recognize the talent of the writer Alexander Prokhanov. In 1972 he was accepted into the USSR Writers' Union.

The heyday of his journalistic talent occurred during perestroika. In 1986, he began to actively publish in the magazines “Our Contemporary” and “Young Guard”, continuing his collaboration with “Literaturnaya Gazeta”. From 1989 to 1991, he headed the magazine “Soviet Literature” as editor-in-chief. He was a permanent member of the editorial board of the magazine “Soviet Warrior”. At the same time, he never became a member of the Communist Party, which is surprising for a person who managed to build such a career in the Soviet Union.

He is one of the first to understand that society needs a new platform on which thoughts and ideas can be expressed in a fundamentally new language, without fear of censorship or any restrictions. Therefore, at the very end of 1990, he created a newspaper called “Day”. Automatically becomes its editor-in-chief.

"Word to the People"

In the middle of the summer of 1991, it published the famous “anti-perestroika” appeal, known as the “Word to the People.” First of all, it was addressed to the army. In it, Soviet political scientists and cultural figures criticized the policies pursued by Mikhail Gorbachev and Boris Yeltsin. They called for stopping the collapse of the USSR and creating an influential opposition movement. Many now view the “Word to the People” as an ideological platform for the August coup, which took place exactly four weeks later.

The Den newspaper was considered one of the most oppositional and radical publications in Russia in the early 90s. It was published regularly until October 1993. After the shooting of the White House and Yeltsin's coup, the publication was banned. But it immediately began to be published under the name “Tomorrow”, and it has remained in this form to this day. Its editor-in-chief is still the writer Alexander Prokhanov.

Participation in the political life of the country

In the early 90s, Alexander Prokhanov, whose biography is given in this article, took a direct part in the political life of the country not only through his newspaper. In 1991, during the presidential elections of the RSFSR, he was a confidant of General Albert Makashov. Makashov, who represented the CPSU in these elections, took fifth place, gaining less than 4% of the votes. During the August putsch, Prokhanov took the side of the State Emergency Committee.

In September 1993, the hero of our article on the pages of his newspaper “Den” called for opposition to the unconstitutional actions of Boris Yeltsin, arguing that a coup d’etat had actually taken place in the country. Makashov, who took part in armed clashes in Moscow, became an active participant in the October events.

After the newspaper was banned by the Ministry of Justice, according to some sources, the editorial office was destroyed by riot police, workers were beaten, and all archives and property were destroyed.

Alexander Prokhanov founded the newspaper “Zavtra” on November 5th. It is still distinguished by its radical position; the materials it publishes are often accused of being pro-fascist, imperial, and anti-Semitic.

At the same time, Prokhanov remains true to himself, supporting Gennady Zyuganov in the 1996 presidential elections. However, those elections also ended in defeat for the communist leader. As you know, he lost to Boris Yeltsin in the second round.

At the same time, the hero of our article is now a member of the Council on Public Television, created in 2012.

Style Features

Many are familiar with Alexander Andreevich Prokhanov from books. His style is considered very colorful, original and individual. On the pages of the novels of the hero of our article you can find a large number of metaphors, flowery epithets, interesting characters, and a large number of various details.

In his artistic work and journalism one can often find sympathy for the Christian religion and native Russian traditions, while he regularly criticizes liberalism and capitalism. He has stated more than once that he still considers himself a Soviet man.

According to a number of critics, as a writer Prokhanov is a postmodernist, and from an ideological point of view, an imperial author.

Early works

Prokhanov's first works were published in the newspaper Literary Russia, then published in the magazines Family and School, Krugozor, Olen, and Rural Youth. From his early works, one can highlight the story “The Wedding,” which was published in 1967.

His first book was called “I’m Going on My Way”, it was published in 1971 with a foreword by Yuri Trifonov. This is a collection of stories in which the author depicts a real Russian village with its patriarchal ethics, rituals and traditions, original landscapes and characters. Following this, in 1972, he wrote the essay “Burning Flower”, where he talks about the problems faced by the Soviet village.

Among his stories published in the 70s, it is necessary to highlight “Two”, “The Tin Bird”, “Trans-Siberian Machinist”, “Mill 1220”, “Fire Font”, “Red Juice in the Snow”. In 1974, his second collection entitled “The Grass Turns Yellow” was published.

The following year, his first novel, entitled “The Nomadic Rose,” appeared in print. It is written in a semi-essay style, based on the author’s impressions from business trips to the Far East, Siberia and Central Asia. In it he addresses the pressing problems of contemporary Soviet society. They also bother Prokhanov in three subsequent novels: “The Place of Action”, “Time is Noon” and “The Eternal City”.

Military-political novel

The writer's style changed dramatically in the 80s. He begins to create in the genre of military-political novel. The works are based on his business trips to different countries of the world.

During this period, his entire tetralogy “Burning Gardens” was published, which includes the novels “A Tree in the Center of Kabul”, “In the Islands of a Hunter...”, “The Africanist”, “And Here Comes the Wind”.

He again turns to the Afghan theme in the novel “Drawings of a Battle Artist” of 1986. Its main character is the artist Veretenov, who, on instructions from his editors, travels to Afghanistan to make a series of drawings of Soviet military personnel. At the same time, he also has a personal interest - to see his son.

The soldiers who returned from Afghanistan are described in Alexander Prokhanov's 1988 book, Six Hundred Years After the Battle.

"Septateuch"

The series of novels “Septateuch” is becoming popular. It is united by the main character, General Beloseltsev, who stands out for his unique experience of contemplation and vision.

This cycle includes “The Dream of Kabul”, “And Here Comes the Wind”, “In the Islands is a Hunter”, “The Africanist”, “The Last Soldier of the Empire”, “Red-Brown”, “Mr. Hexogen”.

The last novel on this list has become especially popular. Prokhanov published it in 2002. The book describes the events of 1999 in Russia. In particular, a series of explosions in residential buildings, which led to numerous casualties, is presented as a government conspiracy to transfer power from the current president to his successor.

The conspirators, including representatives of the special services, use intrigue, murder and all kinds of provocations in Prokhanov’s novel. The author himself noted that he initially perceived Putin as a follower of Yeltsin, but then reconsidered his attitude towards him, saying that he stopped the collapse of Russia and removed the oligarchs from the leadership of the country.

This novel clearly demonstrates the writer’s favorite technique, when real events are juxtaposed with completely fantastic things. For example, an oligarch, in whom Berezovsky can be guessed, literally melts in the hospital under an IV and disappears into thin air. The chosen one, in whom a hint of Putin is discerned, asks to fly the plane in private and also disappears, turning into a rainbow.

"The Step of Russian Victory"

In 2012, Prokhanov released a new book called “The Step of Russian Victory”, in a very unusual genre for himself. It talks about the ideology of modern Russia, and its history is conventionally divided into four time periods. These are Kievo-Novgorod Rus', Muscovy, the Russian Empire of the Romanovs and the Stalin Empire.

The entire book consists of four parts. The first contains the main theses devoted to the idea of ​​the “Fifth Empire”; it is called “Hymns of Russian Victory.” The second part pays attention to industrial enterprises, primarily defense plants, its title is “Russian Victory Marches.” The third part, “Psalms of Russian Victory,” talks about Russian parishes and monasteries, and the final “Codes of Russian Victory” talks about the Eurasian Union, which should serve as the forerunner of the “Fifth Empire.”

Film and television

Several of Prokhanov’s works were filmed or staged on the theater stage:

• In 1972, the film “Fatherland” was released based on his script.
• In 1983, Anatoly Granik directed the melodrama “The Scene” based on the novel of the same name by the hero of our article.
• In 1988, Alexei Saltykov’s drama “Paid for Everything” was released, for which Prokhanov wrote the script.
• In 2012, the project was launched on the Rossiya-1 TV channel. The series of documentary films “Soldier of the Empire” tells in detail about the personality of Alexander Prokhanov himself.
• “Passion for the State” is a documentary film from 2018, in which the author analyzes the latest corruption scandals, explosions in the St. Petersburg metro, the demonization of the country itself and its leaders in the West and the liberal public.

Public life

Prokhanov often participates in all kinds of political talk shows, expressing his opinion on events taking place in the country. He is a regular guest of Vladimir Solovyov in his talk show “To the Barrier” and the new project “Duel”. He is one of the presenters of the “Replica” column, which airs on the “Russia 24” channel.

Alexander Prokhanov expressed his opinion on pension reform. He noted that Putin’s address to the nation was impeccable, the president presented convincing arguments. Therefore, he himself supports this reform.

Writer's wife

We can say that the personal life of Alexander Prokhanov was successful. He lived his whole life married to Lyudmila Konstantinova, who after the wedding took his last name.

They had three children - a daughter and two sons. One of them, Andrei Fefelov, became a publicist. Now he and his father work as editor of the Den Internet channel. Vasily Prokhanov became a performer of original songs and a photographer.

In 2011, Lyudmila Prokhanova passed away.

It is known that in his free time the hero of our article collects butterflies and draws.

The website “a” opens a series of conversations with public and political figures of modern Russia. At the center of our conversation are the problems of strengthening Russian civilization, returning to spiritual roots and traditions, topical issues of modern life in our society, and also, of course, reflections on the lessons of the history of our country. We will also try to find out what prominent politicians and public figures in Russia know about the Old Believers, about the Russian church tradition. Of course, first of all, we are interested in representatives of the patriotic wing of the Russian elite. People for whom the concept of “Russian civilization” is not an empty phrase. Today we are talking with the editor-in-chief of the Den TV channel, deputy editor of the Zavtra newspaper Andrey Fefelov.

What do you understand the “Russian World” to be? How far does it extend geographically and what ideological concepts does it cover?

The Russian world is the entire universe, because the Russian people have cosmic thinking, and Russia has no spatial, spiritual, or temporal limitations. That’s why you can only believe in it, and measuring it in kilometers or kilograms is completely pointless. Russia is the territory of a miracle. The rays from this miracle penetrate walls, clouds, and zones of eternal emptiness, scattering throughout all the nooks and crannies of the universe.

Of course, the concept of the Russian World is associated with the complex, deep and mysterious phenomenon of the Russian language, within which, as in a cradle, reside the meanings, images and symbols of universal consciousness.

For me, the Russian World is a springboard for the implementation of the plan for global Transformation. This is a platform for the embodiment of the idea of ​​​​the immortality of humanity. Ideas encrypted in Russian culture, and not only.

But it is not only modern Russia that represents the Russian world. The seeds of Russianness, the Russian ecumene, are scattered throughout the planet, throughout the entire universe. In particular, the Old Believers, who have lived in Latin America for hundreds of years, can be called part of the Russian world. Some kind of lunar rover, which was stuck on the Moon many years ago, can also be attributed to the Russian world. This is also part of the Russian world. These are the touches left by Russian civilization, Russian culture, Russian technology, engineering, Russian thought.

The distant ancestors of your family were Molokans. Another relative, Ivan Stepanovich Prokhanov (1869-1935), was a famous composer and preacher of the Evangelical Baptist Church. Moreover, his spiritual songs became famous even among the Old Believers. Your father, A. A. Prokhanov, identifies himself with Orthodoxy. What can you say about the spiritual path of your family? Is it possible to somehow compare it with the historical path of our country?

Some of my ancestors come from Russian sectarianism. Both the Prokhanovs, the Fefelovs, and the Mazaevs were once peasants and belonged to the Molokan environment. Their descendants, having become merchants, provided their children with education and sent their children to study in Europe.

My great-grandfather Alexander Stepanovich Prokhanov became a doctor of medicine in Imperial Russia and received personal nobility for his scientific merits. Such people no longer expressed themselves in the format of the folk Molokan faith. This is how variations of Russian Baptists appeared, the sect of “Evangelical Christians”, which was founded by the brother of my great-grandfather you mentioned.

However, the era soon changed, and spiritual issues faded into the background. Let's say, my grandmother, who came from a religious Molokan family, considered herself an atheist all her life, and only a year before her death, at the request of her son, her grandchildren and daughter-in-law, she accepted Holy Baptism at the age of 96. When she was accepted into the pioneers, Leon Trotsky spoke at the ceremonial meeting.

Thus, my father had a non-religious upbringing, but again the 70s came when interest in religion grew among the intelligentsia. That's when my parents were baptized. Thus, questions of faith, church, eschatology accompanied me from early childhood.

Probably, his father’s choice was influenced by his friend Lev Lebedev, who later became an archpriest, a famous church historian and theologian. On top of everything, Father Lev was also a monarchist; he walked around Andropov’s Moscow in a bowler hat and with an umbrella as long as a cane. His belt buckle was also old-fashioned: the imperial double-headed eagle glimmered on it.

Do the works of A. A. Prokhanov and the apocalyptic theme in them also originate in this period?

Eschatology is an integral part of the Orthodox worldview. However, in my father’s texts this theme emerges as a metaphor for the catastrophic nature of modern civilization. As a journalist, he took part in several wars, later earning the title of battle writer. With his own eyes he saw the destroyed reactor at Chernobyl. I observed the collapse of Soviet society, its slide into the nightmarish 90s. Isn't this a parable about the End Times? Burning horizons, in dreams and in reality, are what makes one think about the imminent Apocalypse.

So, the tradition of Molokanism has left you?

The tradition is gone, but the connections exist. One day a whole delegation of Molokans came to the newspaper “Zavtra”. Such respectable, neat, bearded people with calm faces. It turns out that Yuri Luzhkov for some reason oppressed the Molokan community at that time and deprived it of a house of worship. And then, knowing about our origin, they came to us for information support. We did not refuse them and even sheltered them for a while. On several Sundays in a row, Molokans’ meetings were held in the editorial office of “Zavtra” and psalms composed by my great-grandfathers were sung.

Now many patriots talk about the greatness of pre-revolutionary Russia. At the same time, we must remember that the Romanov dynasty took tragic steps towards dividing the Russian people. In the 17th century, under Alexei Mikhailovich, a church schism took place, when the Russians were divided into Old Believers and New Believers. At the beginning of the 18th century, under Peter I, there was a cultural split into the highest elite with balls and assemblies, on the one hand, and the stinking peasant, on the other, and under the subsequent Romanovs, the ruling class of Russia became French-German-speaking, foreign-living, and largely comprador. What do you think about these divisions and could they have been avoided?

The Romanovs left a huge mark on Russian history. And the Western vector in their activities can be seen very clearly from the first years of the dynasty. However, I consider it harmful and stupid to give scathing unambiguous assessments of this or that figure or an entire era. Let's say Alexander II, an extremely dubious figure. He was fond of spiritualism, carried out a peasant reform with colossal violations and a bias in favor of the nobility, opened the way to Russia for foreign capital, and gave Alaska to the United States almost for nothing. However, the era of Alexander II is the time of the dawn of Russian literature: Turgenev, Tolstoy and Dostoevsky...

The triumphs of the “white general” Skobelev are also the period of the reign of Alexander II. You can, of course, shout: “Oh, the Romanov family, they ruined Russia...”. Or you can look at the history of the country more broadly and more carefully. In society, as always, complex and very contradictory processes were taking place, and the Romanov sovereigns were also involved in these processes. It should be remembered that in Russia after the overthrow of the dynasty, another period began, no less complex, no less tragic and contradictory. And before the Romanovs there were the Rurikovichs. And there may also be questions for them. Meanwhile, the Rurikovichs laid the foundation of the Russian empire.

It is interesting that the Romanov family - this cohort of sovereigns and empresses - stands between two pillars of Russian history: Ivan IV Rurikovich and Joseph Stalin. At the same time, we know that both Stalin and Ivan the Terrible have been given many terrible labels. They are sadists, bloodsuckers, and madmen. Moreover, these labels were invented not only by biased historians. Painters, writers and filmmakers have also done their best here. At least take Pavel Lungin’s vile film “ Tsar" Just dirt and hoax! It’s sad that the guru of modern patriotic youth, Ivan Okhlobystin, participated in the filming of this disgusting thing. In my opinion, he should apologize to the people for this role of the royal jester. Apologize for participating in a case that discredits the first Russian Tsar, the entire Russian history and the very idea of ​​the Russian state.

The figure of Peter the Great stands apart. He is a great destroyer and a great builder at the same time. In some ways similar to Patriarch Nikon and Lenin. Pushkin loved and felt Peter very much. He saw in him something that no historian or sociologist understood.

But still, without destroying Russian customs, without tearing off the beard, it was possible to build ships?

This is a debatable question, depending on what kind of ships. After all, the Pomors also had their own ships - boats. But it was a merchant and fishing fleet. But to build caravels, you need a European outfit.

But this Westernizing period was apparently necessary. This is part of our maturation as a people. We have already begun to return to Russian origins, to ancient culture, to forms that grow from our very nature, from language and faith.

We must understand that the entire history of Russia is sacred, so we must treat it as some kind of sacred gift from above and not sprinkle it with dust. Even the demons of Russian history, such as, say, Leon Trotsky, must be carefully examined and read in a single grandiose, sacred context. It would seem that he is the enemy of the entire Russian people! But, nevertheless, this is “our” enemy, “our” unique demon. And no other story has produced such a figure. By the way, speaking objectively, Trotsky is known as the creator of the Workers 'and Peasants' Red Army, which became the striking force for collecting the territories of the Russian Empire, which collapsed in February 1917.

In modern Ukraine, it is customary to talk about the crimes of the Soviet regime, tear down monuments to Lenin and call for a ban on the Communist Party. Maidan demands to disavow and condemn the crimes of the totalitarian regime. Why then do they not demand to disavow such “crimes of the totalitarian regime” as the establishment of historically unjustified administrative borders of the Ukrainian SSR during the time of Lenin-Khrushchev?

Those people who are tearing down monuments to Lenin in Ukraine have no logic. Their logic is that Lenin is a Russian man, a “Muscovite,” who with his Bolshevik codes came to Ukraine, this supposedly flourishing, mighty, majestic, “independent state.” He enslaved her, and then imposed a Bolshevik totalitarian regime on her, caused a famine, and so on. They really don’t want to say or even remember that the current territory of Ukraine is the territory of the Ukrainian SSR, created and composed of several provinces of the Russian Empire precisely by the Bolsheviks...

The history that is taught to Ukrainian children is structured more abruptly than Tolkien’s books. This is not history, but pure fiction, built on the ideology of “Banderaism.” In addition to ultra-ukronationalism, it is based on the demonization of Bolshevism, the association of Bolshevism with their invented “Muscovy”, and “Muscovy” with “Asianism”... By destroying ties with Russia, they allegedly make a European choice and are moving somewhere in Europe, away from Stalin, Lenin and Putin. In fact, they are turning their country into Somalia, with all the ensuing consequences.

Ukromancers show an persistent desire to own foreign lands, to impose their language of a small people on all the other numerous peoples living in this country. The last Maidan gave rise to an expansionist wave among young people, and even with all the hatred towards Lenin, no one is going to give up the “Leninist territorial heritage” there. But at the same time, the power elites of Ukraine have no understanding of what a true empire is.

This is always a kind of compromise between peoples, an agreement based on super-values. If an empire is built on the idea of ​​total dominance of one nation, then this empire is doomed. This is how the German Reichs collapsed one by one, because they did not give the opportunity to bloom to all peoples, to all flowers in the inflorescence. Unfortunately, this imperial tolerance has not been observed throughout the history of Ukraine’s independence.

The policy of Ukrainization of the non-Ukrainian population has been clearly manifested in recent years. This policy can be defined as ethnocide. Genocide is direct physical destruction, and here the recoding of consciousness, assimilation, resettlement and, of course, expulsion of peoples are used. Now, if some kind of integral Ukrainian ideology appeared, which took into account all factors and was supranational, then we could say that Ukraine had succeeded as a state.

But, unfortunately, current Ukrainianism is parochial Westernism plus redneckism, with elements of Nazism. The Galician group can really influence the situation in Kyiv; this is truly a passionately active layer. In fact, one of the artificial ethnic myths has been created about the cultural and linguistic superiority of the Western, Galician subethnic group, which would not have had much significance in the development of the peoples living in Ukraine if not for the political fate of Ukraine.

Why are there no rallies against the war in Ukraine?

Because Ukraine is now terribly heated. The media is setting people up so that everyone wants blood. The inhabitants have become hostages of their own media, textbooks, and many years of anti-Russian propaganda. People were very, very heated up. The Maidan, which burst like an abscess in February, is a failure. The premature birth of the new government took place. The authorities are weak and afraid of the crowd. As for the peace marches in Russia, they are carried out by the liberal intelligentsia, who for some reason also shut up and no longer hold “Peace Marches”. Liberals are now in favor of an active continuation of military operations, for bombings, for carrying out the so-called “anti-terrorist operation.”

They are committed - this is clearly visible. As soon as America began its most brutal operations in full force, human rights activists fell silent. As soon as Bashar al-Assad began to carry out any military operations, they began to shout, scream, stomp their feet, sprinkle ashes on their heads, tear their shirts and tear curtains with their teeth. This has always been and will be the case, because this group is not self-sufficient and independent. The control center of the army of human rights activists is located in the United States. Human rights organizations work only for the United States and in the interests of the United States.

Now there is such a thing as “Orthodox Stalinism.” How possible is it to combine these words together and does the concept make sense?

Yes, it has the most serious meaning, because Stalin, at the turn of the era, at the terrible change of times, expressed the Russian idea. And part of the Russian idea is Orthodoxy. Building a just society based on Christian morality is what Stalin did. He also built a super-powerful state that would maintain world order. Stalin's Russia stood in the way of Leviathan, global usurious capitalism, from the depths of which the Antichrist will appear. Stalin's USSR is the so-called katechon - holding... A stone in the path of world evil. Therefore, Orthodox Stalinism is not only possible, but also organic. This movement can be considered a mystical projection of the entire Russian history of the twentieth century.

Alexander Prokhanov, whose biography is given in this article, is a famous domestic writer, public and political figure. He is the editor-in-chief and publisher of the newspaper "Zavtra".

Biography of the politician

Alexander Prokhanov, whose biography you can read in this article, was born in Tbilisi in 1938. His ancestors were Molokans. These are representatives of a separate branch of Christianity who do not recognize the cross and icons, do not make the sign of the cross and consider it sinful to eat pork and drink alcohol. They were from the Saratov and Tambov provinces. From there they moved to Transcaucasia.

Grandfather Prokhanov was a Molokan theologian and the brother of Ivan Prokhanov, the founder of the All-Russian Union of Evangelical Christians. Prokhanov’s uncle, who was a well-known botanist in the USSR, was also well known; he was repressed in the 30s, but later rehabilitated.

Alexander Prokhanov, whose biography is in this article, graduated in 1960. Then he went to work at a research institute as an engineer. While still a senior student, he took up writing poetry and prose works.

In 1962-1964 he worked as a forester in Karelia, worked as a tour guide, took tourists to the Khibiny Mountains, and even took part in a geological expedition in Tuva. It was in those years that Alexander Andreevich Prokhanov, whose biography can be found in this article, discovered such writers as Vladimir Naborov and Andrei Platonov.

Literary career

At the end of the 60s, the hero of our article decided for himself that he would connect his future destiny with literature. In 1968 he came to Literaturnaya Gazeta. Two years later, as a special correspondent, he went to report to Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Angola and Cambodia.

One of Prokhanov’s main journalistic successes was reporting on the events that took place at that time on the Soviet-Chinese border. He was the first to write and talk about it openly.

In 1972, journalist Alexander Prokhanov, whose biography you are now reading, was accepted into the Union of Writers of the USSR. In 1986, he began publishing in thick literary magazines “Our Contemporary” and “Young Guard”, and continued to collaborate with “Literary Gazette”.

In 1989, Prokhanov became editor-in-chief of the magazine "Soviet Literature" and was a member of the editorial board of the magazine "Soviet Warrior".

Newspaper "Day"

During perestroika, he took an active civic position. At the very end of 1990, Prokhanov created the newspaper Den. He himself becomes its editor-in-chief. In 1991, he published the famous anti-perestroika appeal, which he entitled “A Word to the People.” In those days, the newspaper became one of the most radical and opposition media, published until the October events of 1993. After this, the authorities closed the publication.

In 1991, Alexander Prokhanov, whose biography is contained in this article, was the general’s confidant during the presidential elections of the RSFSR. Makashov ran for the Communist Party of the RSFSR. As a result, he took only fifth place, gaining less than 4% of the vote. Boris Yeltsin won then, having secured the support of more than 57 percent of the Russian vote. During the August putsch, our hero openly took the side of the State Emergency Committee.

In 1993, Prokhanov in his newspaper Den called Yeltsin's actions a coup d'etat, calling for support for members of the Congress of People's Deputies and the Supreme Council. When tanks shot down the Soviet parliament, the newspaper Den was banned by decision of the Ministry of Justice. The premises in which the editorial office was located were destroyed by riot police. Employees were beaten and property was destroyed, as were archives. By that time, the banned newspaper was being published in Minsk.

The appearance of the newspaper "Zavtra"

In 1993, the son-in-law of the writer Prokhanov, whose last name was Khudorozhkov, registered a new newspaper - “Zavtra”. Prokhanov became its editor-in-chief. The publication is still published, and many accuse it of publishing anti-Semitic materials.

In the 90s, the newspaper was famous for its harsh criticism of the post-Soviet system; it often published materials and articles by popular opposition figures - Dmitry Rogozin, Vladimir Kvachkov, Sergei Kara-Murza, Maxim Kalashnikov.

The newspaper appears in many contemporary works of art. For example, in the novel "Monoclon" by Vladimir Sorokin or in "Akiko" by Viktor Pelevin. Gleb Samoilov even dedicated his song of the same name to this newspaper.

In recent years, the publication has changed its concept. Publications with state-patriotic content appeared in it. Prokhanov proclaimed the “Fifth Empire” project, and he became more loyal to the authorities, although he still often criticized the existing situation in the country.

In 1996, Prokhanov again took an active part in the presidential campaign. This time he supported the candidacy. It was not possible to decide the fate of the winner in the first round. Yeltsin won 35%, and Zyuganov - 32. In the second round, Yeltsin won with a little over 53 percent of the vote.

Prokhanov’s political activity did not suit many. In 1997 and 1999, he was attacked by unknown assailants.

"Mr. Hexogen"

Prokhanov became famous as a writer in 2002, when he published the novel “Mister Hexogen.” For it he received the National Best Seller Award.

Events develop in Russia in 1999. A series of explosions in residential buildings that occurred at that time is presented as a secret conspiracy by the authorities. At the center of the story is an ex-KGB general named Beloseltsev. He is recruited to participate in an operation, the ultimate goal of which is the rise to power of a certain Chosen One.

Prokhanov himself admitted that at that time he considered Putin as a member of Yeltsin’s team. But over time he changed his point of view. Prokhanov began to argue that it was Putin who harshly stopped the collapse of the country, removed the oligarchs from direct control of it, and organized Russian statehood in its modern form.

In 2012, he joined the Council for Public Television, which was formed by decree of President Vladimir Putin. Currently he holds the post of Deputy Chairman of the Council under the Federal Ministry of Defense.

Icon with Stalin

Many people know Prokhanov thanks to his shocking actions. For example, in 2015, he came to a meeting of the plenum of the Union of Writers of Russia, which was held in Belgorod, with the icon “Our Lady of Sovereign”. It depicted Joseph Stalin surrounded by Soviet-era military leaders.

After this, the icon was brought to the Prokhorovsky field during celebrations of the famous tank battle, which largely decided the outcome of the Great Patriotic War.

At the same time, the Belgorod Metropolitanate officially reported that what was present at the service was not an icon with the Generalissimo, but a painting that was painted in an iconographic style, since none of the characters depicted in it were canonized by the Russian Orthodox Church. And some were even persecutors of the church.

It is also widely known that Prokhanov is fond of primitivism and collects butterflies. There are already about three thousand copies in his collection.

Personal life

Of course, when telling the biography of Alexander Prokhanov, one cannot fail to mention the family. He is big and strong. His wife's name was Lyudmila Konstantinovna. After the wedding, she took her husband's surname.

In the biography of Alexander Prokhanov, family and children have always been among the main priorities. He was married to his wife until 2011. She died suddenly. They are survived by a daughter and two sons. Children in the personal life of Alexander Prokhanov (his biography is full of interesting events) play an important role.

Sons of Prokhanov

His sons earned some fame in society. Andrei Fefelov became a publicist and is the editor-in-chief of the Den Internet channel. He received his higher education at MISS, graduated from the Faculty of Engineering.

After university, he immediately went into the army and served in the border troops. During perestroika, he followed his father’s path, became a publicist and writer, and began publishing in political magazines. In 2007, he received the post of editor-in-chief at the newspaper Zavtra, where his father worked. He has a family.

The second son’s name is Vasily Prokhanov, he is a singer-songwriter. In the biography of Alexander Andreevich Prokhanov, family is important. He always paid a lot of attention to her. All fans of his work are interested in the biography and personal life of Alexander Prokhanov.

Litigation

Prokhanov repeatedly became a participant in legal proceedings. In 2014, he wrote an article for Izvestia entitled “Singers and Scoundrels.” It told about Andrei Makarevich’s speech to Ukrainian military personnel. Prokhanov claimed that immediately after the concert, the soldiers went to positions to fire at civilians in Donetsk.

The court ordered to refute these facts, and also to pay Makarevich 500 thousand rubles for moral damage. The city court then overturned the lower court's decision and ordered only a refutation to be posted.

Creativity of Prokhanov

Russian by nationality Alexander Prokhanov. This must be mentioned in his biography. His style is distinguished by its original and colorful language. It contains many metaphors, unusual epithets, and each character is individualized.

In Prokhanov's work, real events almost always coexist with completely fantastic things. For example, in the novel “Mr. Hexogen” already mentioned in this article, an oligarch, similar in description to Berezovsky, once in the hospital, simply melts into thin air. And the Chosen One, in whom many guessed Putin, sat at the helm of the plane, turns into a rainbow.

Also in his work one can notice sympathy for Christianity and everything Russian. He himself still considers himself a Soviet man.

Early works

Prokhanov's first works were stories that he published in newspapers and magazines. Many people remember his story “The Wedding” from 1967.

His first collection, entitled “On My Way,” was published in 1971. The preface to it was written by Yuri Trifonov, who was popular at that time. In it, Prokhanov describes the Russian village with its classical rituals, original characters and established ethics. A year later, he publishes another book about the problems of the Soviet village - "Burning Color".

His first novel was published in 1975. It was called "Nomadic Rose". It is semi-essay in nature and is dedicated to the author’s impressions from trips to the Far East and Siberia.

In it, as well as in several subsequent works, Prokhanov addresses the problems of Soviet society. These are the novels "The Scene", "It's Noon" and "The Eternal City".

A. A. Prokhanov born February 26, 1938 in Tbilisi. Prokhanov's ancestors, the Molokans, were exiled to Transcaucasia during the time of Catherine II. In 1960, Prokhanov graduated from the Moscow Aviation Institute and worked as an engineer at a research institute. In my last year at university I began writing poetry and prose. In 1962-1964. worked as a forester in Karelia, took tourists to the Khibiny Mountains, and took part in a geological party in Tuva. During these years, Prokhanov discovered A.P. Platonov and became interested in V.V. Nabokov. Since 1970, he worked as a correspondent for Literaturnaya Gazeta in Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Cambodia, Angola and other places. Prokhanov was the first to describe in his report in 1969 the events on Damansky Island during the Soviet-Chinese border conflict. In 1972, Prokhanov became a member of the USSR Joint Venture. Since 1986, he has been actively publishing in the magazines “Young Guard”, “Our Contemporary”, as well as in the “Literary Gazette”. From 1989 to 1991 Prokhanov works as editor-in-chief of the magazine "Soviet Literature". In December 1990, he created his own newspaper, Den, where he also became editor-in-chief. In 1991, during the presidential elections of the RSFSR, Prokhanov was a confidant of the candidate General Albert Makashov.

During the August putsch Prokhanov supports the State Emergency Committee. In September 1993, he spoke out in his newspaper against Yeltsin’s unconstitutional actions, calling them a coup d’etat, and supported the RF Armed Forces. After the tank shooting of parliament, the newspaper Den was banned by the Ministry of Justice. The newspaper's editorial office was destroyed by riot police, its employees were beaten, its property and archives were destroyed. Two issues of the newspaper, already banned by that time, were clandestinely published in Minsk as special issues of the communist newspaper “We and Time.” In November 1993, Prokhanov registered a new newspaper, “Zavtra,” and became its editor-in-chief. In the 1996 presidential elections, Prokhanov supported the candidacy of the Communist Party candidate Gennady Zyuganov, and in 1997 he became a co-founder of the Patriotic Information Agency. Twice - in 1997 and 1999, he was attacked by unknown persons.

He is interested in drawing in the style of primitivism. Collects butterflies (there are more than 3 thousand copies in the collection). Married, has two sons and a daughter. Awarded state awards of the USSR.

Since the late 1960s Prokhanov as a special correspondent for Literaturnaya Gazeta, he visited various “hot” spots in Latin America, Angola, Mozambique, Kampuchea, Ethiopia, Afghanistan, etc. In his numerous essays and reports, Prokhanov described the events he witnessed.

In December 1990, Prokhanov founded and became editor-in-chief of the weekly newspaper Den, which had the subtitle “Newspaper of the Spiritual Opposition.” On July 15, 1991, the newspaper published an “anti-perestroika” appeal, “A Word to the People.” The newspaper became one of the most radical opposition publications in Russia in the early 1990s and was published regularly until the October events of 1993, after which it was closed by the authorities. However, on November 5, 1993, the writer’s son-in-law A. A. Khudorozhkov founded and registered the newspaper “Zavtra”, of which Prokhanov became editor-in-chief. A number of organizations accuse the newspaper of publishing anti-Semitic materials.

The first stories and essays were published in Literary Russia, Krugozor, Olen, Family and School, and Rural Youth. The story “The Wedding” (1967) became particularly successful. In the second half of the 1960s, Prokhanov's essays and reports attracted the attention of readers in the USSR.

Prokhanov’s first book, “I’m Going on My Way” (1971), was published with a foreword by Yuri Trifonov: “The theme of Russia, the Russian people, for Prokhanov is not a tribute to fashion or a profitable enterprise, but part of the soul. The young writer’s prose is characterized by great sincerity.” The collection “I’m Going on My Way” depicts the Russian village with its rituals, old-fashioned ethics, original characters and landscapes. In 1972, Prokhanov published a book of essays, “Burning Color,” about the problems of the Soviet village. In the same year, with the assistance of Yu. V. Trifonov, Prokhanov was accepted into the Union of Writers of the USSR. Since 1985, Prokhanov has been secretary of the Writers' Union of the RSFSR.

In the early 1970s Prokhanov published a number of stories: “The Tin Bird”, “Red Juice in the Snow”, “Two”, “Stan 1220”, “Trans-Siberian Machinist” (all - 1974), “Fire Font” (1975), etc. In 1974, the second collection was published stories and short stories “The grass is turning yellow.”

The basis of the first novel “The Nomadic Rose” (1975), which is semi-essay in nature, was the writer’s impressions from trips to Siberia, the Far East and Central Asia. In this and three subsequent novels - “Time is Noon” (1977), “The Place of Action” (1979) and “The Eternal City” (1981) Prokhanov addresses current problems of Soviet society.
"Burning Gardens"

Since the early 1980s, the writer began working in the genre of military-political novels; his numerous business trips served as material for new works. The travel novels “A Tree in the Center of Kabul”, “In the Islands of a Hunter...”, “The Africanist”, “And Here Comes the Wind” form the tetralogy “Burning Gardens”, created in the wake of events and characterized by intense plot development.

Later, Prokhanov again turns to the Afghan topic. The main character of the novel “Drawings of a Battle Artist” (1986) is the artist Veretenov, who, on instructions from the editors, goes to Afghanistan in order to make a series of drawings of Soviet soldiers, and who wants to see his son, a soldier. The novel Six Hundred Years After the Battle (1988) tells the story of demobilized soldiers who served in Afghanistan.

In the 1970-90s, he created several notable stories and short stories: “Polina” (1976), “Invisible Wheat”, “On the Moonbeam”, “Snow and Coal” (all - 1977), “The Gray Soldier” (1985) , “The Gunsmith” (1986), “Caravan”, “Dearest”, “Muslim Wedding”, “Kandahar Outpost” (all - 1989) and stories: “Admiral” (1983), “Lighter Azure” (1986), “Sign Virgins" (1990), etc. For the story "Muslim Wedding" (as the best story of the year), Prokhanov received the. A.P. Chekhov. In 1989-1990, Prokhanov was the editor-in-chief of the Soviet Literature magazine, published in 9 languages ​​and distributed in more than 100 countries.

In 2002, the novel Prokhanov“”, where he artistically portrays the version of the guilt of the Russian special services in the bombings of residential buildings in Russia in 1999, receives the “National Bestseller” award. "Mr. Hexogen" attracted the attention of critics and the public. The novel tells about a conspiracy between intelligence services, oligarchs and politicians of different directions. The purpose of the conspiracy is to change power in the country by transferring it from the decrepit Idol to the young Chosen One. The conspirators use murders, Kremlin intrigues, house explosions, provocations, etc.

Prokhanov's style is often considered original, colorful, and emphatically individual. Prokhanov’s language, as many critics believe, is replete with vivid metaphors, original, flowery epithets, the characters are written out clearly, clearly, with an abundance of details, the description itself has a pronounced emotional and even passionate coloring, the author’s attitude towards this or that character is clearly visible. However, according to the German Slavist Wolfgang Kazak, Prokhanov’s works are characterized by “a banal, sugary style of writing, based on shameless lies and oversaturated with cheap decorative epithets.” Definitely realistic actions and events coexist with things of a completely fantastic nature (in the novel “Mr. Hexogene”, one of the oligarchs (possibly similar to Berezovsky), having fallen under an IV in a hospital, melts and disappears into thin air; the Chosen One (possibly similar to Putin), having asked to fly the plane alone in the cockpit, he disappears, turning into a rainbow).
Sympathy for Christianity, Russia and everything Russian, and disapproval of capitalism are clearly visible.